Attorney Articles
Attorney at Law Magazine Features Ross Article on Maximizing Resolution Potential in Online Mediation
January 7, 2026 - Attorney at Law Magazine
David Ross has worked with clients to prepare and implement a comprehensive defense strategy in response to state and nationwide class actions and mass actions, commercial litigation, or other complex litigation or demands. He represents clients in all aspects of complex civil litigation before federal and state courts and in alternative dispute forums.
David has advised clients in advance of and while defending individual and class actions involving cybersecurity, product liability issues such as defective vehicles, improperly labeled food products, medical testing and improper packaging, and class actions involving privacy, consumer protection and improper care. He also has worked on recall procedures and served as the NHTSA-approved auditor for a manufacturer as part of a resolution with the government.
Commercial Litigation, Class and Mass Actions
David cochairs the firm’s Commercial Litigation and Class Action Defense practice teams. In his class and mass action practice, David works with clients in early resolution planning, dispositive motion and discovery strategies, and administration of the litigation throughout the entire case process. Representative cases involve data breaches, consumer protection structures, product liability, internet conduct, fraud, employment discrimination, and other labor offenses, statutory claims and common law claims. David works across disciplines to counter the complex claims that increasingly characterize class and mass actions, in many cases obtaining early dismissals of the named plaintiffs or defeating motions for class certification. In addition, David conducts alternative dispute resolution advocacy for clients, and advises clients throughout any class settlement and claims processes. David also conducts continuing education and informational presentations on class actions for the law firm, clients and other groups. In addition, David’s practice has included white collar defense, compliance and insurance coverage litigation.
Cybersecurity & Data Breach Class Actions
David works with businesses, individuals and insurers to provide early privacy and data breach litigation planning, individual and class settlement or defense strategies, and comprehensive litigation management. David has represented defendants in data breach class actions in state and federal courts in jurisdictions throughout the nation, teaming with colleagues in Wilson Elser’s regional offices to provide a timely and effective response to these actions. David and his team have pursued dispositive motion practice in numerous cases, resulting in beneficial precedent, including in issues of first impression. David has steered cases throughout the data breach class action process, and, when appropriate, successfully negotiated the resolution of class actions in the best interests of the client.
Investigations & e-Discovery
David has propounded and responded to many discovery- and other litigation-related efforts, including third-party subpoenas and Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act requests. Keeping abreast of the proliferation of electronic documents and the accompanying laws and requirements surrounding them, David has overseen numerous electronic and paper document collection projects and productions, privilege logs, personnel interviews and depositions, and online and paper document reviews.
David Ross has worked with clients to prepare and implement a comprehensive defense strategy in response to state and nationwide class actions and mass actions, commercial litigation, or other complex litigation or demands. He represents clients in all aspects of complex civil litigation before federal and state courts and in alternative dispute forums.
David has advised clients in advance of and while defending individual and class actions involving cybersecurity, product liability issues such as defective vehicles, improperly labeled food products, medical testing and improper packaging, and class actions involving privacy, consumer protection and improper care. He also has worked on recall procedures and served as the NHTSA-approved auditor for a manufacturer as part of a resolution with the government.
David Ross has worked with clients to prepare and implement a comprehensive defense strategy in response to state and nationwide class actions and mass actions, commercial litigation, or other complex litigation or demands. He represents clients in all aspects of complex civil litigation before federal and state courts and in alternative dispute forums.
David has advised clients in advance of and while defending individual and class actions involving cybersecurity, product liability issues such as defective vehicles, improperly labeled food products, medical testing and improper packaging, and class actions involving privacy, consumer protection and improper care. He also has worked on recall procedures and served as the NHTSA-approved auditor for a manufacturer as part of a resolution with the government.
Washington, D.C. partners David Ross and Kevin P. Farrell and associate Daniel Coffman secured a rare acknowledgement from the District of Columbia Superior Court, which conceded it committed a clear error in previously certifying a class in a case related to vehicle repossession practices. The court had found that proposed class members suffered similar injuries based on an alleged practice of overcharging for repossession and vehicle storage and other actions taken after a customer’s default. Wilson Elser filed a motion contending that the court did not address issues presented in its Opposition to Class Certification. The court agreed, finding that a class cannot be certified for several reasons: (1) plaintiff lacks standing because her claims are based entirely on past conduct; (2) plaintiff cannot serve as class representative or a member of a class because her claims are time-barred; (3) arbitration and class waiver clauses in the plaintiff’s and proposed class member’s contracts preclude class certification; and (4) the court’s sua sponte reliance on a municipal regulation was misplaced.
David M. Ross, Kevin P. Farrell and Daniel R. Coffman
Daniel Coffman (Associate-Washington, DC), Anjali Das (Partner-Chicago, IL), David Ross (Partner-Washington, DC), Kim Viergever (Of Counsel-Denver, CO) and Ryan Williams (Partner-Denver, CO) obtained dismissal with prejudice of a federal data breach class action filed against a services vendor for mental health care providers in the District of Colorado. The case comprised eight consolidated class actions brought by 15 named plaintiffs that arose out of a ransomware incident that involved the personal information of almost 4.3 million individuals and included sensitive information such as health information and Social Security numbers. The court agreed that all of the named plaintiffs lack Article III standing, dissecting each of their alleged theories of harm and coming down on the side of the more reasoned courts that have found these types of theories fail to establish standing – public disclosure of private information, increased spam, diminution in value of PHI/PII, emotional distress and future harm. The court concluded that “Plaintiffs have failed to allege injuries in fact that are fairly traceable to the Defendants’ complained-of conduct,” and issued a judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice and closing the case.
Daniel R. Coffman, Anjali C. Das, David M. Ross, Kimberly Viergever and Ryan A. Williams