Karen L. Bashor (Partner-Las Vegas, NV) and Kimberly Nelson (Associate-Las Vegas, NV) obtained summary judgment on reconsideration in the District court of Clark County, Nevada on behalf of the firm’s clients – an esthetician/cosmetologist and her LLC. The plaintiff claimed her face was burned, scarred and left disfigured following a non-invasive cosmetic procedure, fibroblast. After filing an answer to plaintiff’s complaint, Karen and Kim filed their motion for summary judgement as a matter of law on the enforceability of a waiver of liability signed by the plaintiff, which waived, released and discharged defendants from all claims for liability, including personal injury arising out of negligence. The waiver included language that the plaintiff recognized side effects may occur. Our motion was denied because the waiver of liability did not include the word “burn” as a possible side effect. As Nevada case law does not require the specification of all plausible injuries for waiver of liability to be enforceable, Karen and Kim filed a motion for reconsideration. Two days prior to mediation, where the demand was near seven figures, the district court judge not only agreed the prior decision was erroneous warranting reconsideration, but granted summary judgment in favor of our clients on all causes of action, agreeing that the plain language of the waiver, warning of redness of the skin, inflammation and irritation, was sufficient to shield defendants from liability and dismiss the entire case.