Michael Lowry (Partner-Las Vegas) and Jonathan Pattillo (Associate-Las Vegas) were granted summary judgment in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Las Vegas on behalf of an RV dealership client against a warranty claim. After purchasing an RV, the plaintiffs alleged they immediately began experiencing problems, and filed suit seeking to unwind the purchase and consequential damages. The court granted Michael and Jonathan summary judgment at the end of discovery, as the plaintiffs had not designated an expert witness to explain how the RV's systems worked and why the system was allegedly defective. Also, the losses plaintiffs alleged were economic losses, and finally, plaintiffs had not preserved the RV in a way that provided the dealership meaningful access to assess its condition. The plaintiffs did not dispute these points, instead arguing dismissal without prejudice was appropriate per Rule 41(a)(2). As the statute of limitations on the contract had not yet expired, that would have allowed them to re-file the case. The court rejected that argument, noting it came just 48 days before the start of the trial stack to which the case was assigned. The customer later dismissed in lieu of appealing in exchange for a waiver of costs.