Arman Nafisi (Partner-Phoenix) and Leeza Birko (Associate-Phoenix) obtained a dismissal in a breach of contract and legal malpractice suit against Wilson Elser's client, a licensed attorney. During oral arguments, Leeza contended that the language in our client's retainer agreement with the plaintiff specifically limited the scope of engagement. In addition, the plaintiff's allegations were used against him to prove that the restricted scope was exceeded. Arizona's procedural rules allowed for annexing the retainer agreement to the moving papers without requiring the court to treat the motion as one for summary judgment. The court granted Leeza and Arman's motion to dismiss. The court was further persuaded to dismiss the plaintiff's multitude of other claims as inapplicable, adopting as an issue of first impression the ABA's stance against "shotgun pleadings" and because the claims fell outside the gravamen of the plaintiff's action.