Quincy Pham (Associate-San Francisco, CA), in a recent legal malpractice case, doggedly filed demurrer after demurrer against the unrelenting pro se plaintiffs, a former client and his father. These plaintiffs would accuse Quincy of all sorts of misdeeds, require literal hours-long meet and confer calls, and add new allegations and documents with each amended complaint. While the original complaint was 10 pages, the full additional charge was 132 pages, and the opposition to one of the demurrers was in excess of 400 pages. Ultimately, the Court sustained Quincy’s demurrer without leave to amend. A few days after Quincy got the case dismissed, Peter Catalanotti (Partner-San Francisco, CA) received a call from an attorney in San Mateo who needed representation in a case brought by a pro se/former client. He had seen the tentative ruling and eventual order on the demurrer Quincy filed and decided he wanted our team to represent him. We confirmed that we were on panel with his carrier and were assigned the case.