News Briefs
Wilson Elser Mock Trial Invitational Strengthens the Firm’s Next Generation of Trial Talent
May 11, 2026
Obtained defense verdict in traumatic brain injury case in Worcester Superior Court in which the plaintiff alleged more than $1 million in damages.
Obtained defense verdicts as first chair following multi-day trials in Norfolk Superior Court and Suffolk Superior Court on cases involving motor vehicle accidents.
Obtained directed verdict for the defense in West Roxbury District Court on a case resulting from a pedestrian accident.
Obtained defense verdict in traumatic brain injury case in Worcester Superior Court in which the plaintiff alleged more than $1 million in damages.
Obtained defense verdicts as first chair following multi-day trials in Norfolk Superior Court and Suffolk Superior Court on cases involving motor vehicle accidents.
Obtained directed verdict for the defense in West Roxbury District Court on a case resulting from a pedestrian accident.
Beata Shapiro (Partner-Boston, MA) and Dennis Maher (Associate-Boston, MA) obtained summary judgment in favor of a client shipping company, resulting in dismissal of claims of negligent selection and vicarious liability over an independent trucking company and its driver, who was involved in a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of a motorcycle driver. At the time of the accident the truck driver had completed delivery of the shipping company’s cargo and was on his way home in the truck. In granting the motion, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts found that any agency relationship or control by the defendant had ended prior to the accident, and that the truck driver was not acting within the scope of any employment or agency relationship when the accident occurred (as asserted by the plaintiff – the Estate of the motorcyclist). Additionally, the court found no evidence that our client was negligent in hiring or supervising the driver as his driving record did not document any accidents and our client had no reason to believe he was unfit to operate the truck. This decision is significant as it reinforces the principle that vicarious liability for the actions of independent contractors or agents does not extend beyond the scope of employment or agency, particularly when the individual is engaged in personal activities after completing work duties. The case provides valuable guidance for logistics contracts and structures.
Beata Shapiro and Dennis M. Maher