Erin Fraser defends corporate clients in complex product liability actions, with a focus on asbestos litigation. Erin is well versed in all stages of civil litigation and has tried several cases to verdict.

Erin has dedicated numerous volunteer attorney hours to pro bono assignments, including work for the King County Housing Justice Project.

Areas of Focus

Asbestos Litigation
Erin represents product manufacturers and distributors as well as premises owners in matters relating to asbestos and talc exposure in various contexts, including personal product use, chemical plants, commercial plants and buildings, powerhouses, refineries, residences, schools, shipyards and steel mills, among others. She is familiar with the types of exposure sustained by individuals in these fields.

Product Liability / Medical Device
Erin represents manufacturers and distributors of various products, including medical devices, in federal and state courts.

    Education

    • University of San Diego School of Law (J.D., 2006)
    • Boston University (B.A. Political Science, 2003)

    Bar Admissions

    • Washington
    • California
    • Oregon

    Court Admissions

    • U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    • U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington
    • U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington

    Professional Affiliations

    • Washington Defense Trial Lawyers, Board of Trustees

    Awards & Honors

    • Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America®, 2026
    • Selected for inclusion in Best Lawyers® Ones to Watch™, 2020

Erin P. Fraser

Reynolds and Fraser Obtain Summary Judgment for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

Seattle partners Rachel Tallon Reynolds and Erin Fraser obtained summary judgment in the Multnomah County Circuit Court on behalf of a Texas-based solvent manufacturer. The plaintiff alleged he contracted multiple myeloma as a result of exposure to benzene from our client’s products, and sought $10 million in damages. At the outset of the litigation, the Rachel and Erin challenged personal jurisdiction in Oregon State Court, but the plaintiff filed an amended complaint alleging necessary jurisdictional facts. As discovery progressed, the plaintiff was unable to establish personal jurisdiction. We sought summary judgment, asserting that the Texas-based client’s contacts with Oregon were random and fortuitous and not sufficient to confer jurisdiction. The court found that the plaintiff submitted insufficient evidence to establish that the manufacturer purposefully availed itself of the laws of Oregon, and granted summary judgment less than three weeks before trial was scheduled to begin.

The Seattle and Oregon team of Patrick Lynch, Laura Dadowski, Chuqiao Wang and Jami Johnson supported trial preparation.
 

Rachel Tallon Reynolds and Erin P. Fraser

Privacy Settings
Your Privacy Choices
We value your privacy. Under privacy laws in your jurisdiction, you have the right to control how your personal information is used, including the right to opt out of the “sale” or “sharing” of your personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. You may also limit the use of your sensitive personal information.

Below, you can review and adjust your cookie and data sharing preferences. For more information about how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy.

Your Rights and Choices

Opt Out of Sale or Sharing: You may opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising and analytics purposes by turning off Advertising & Targeting Cookies. We will honor your choice and will not sell or share your personal information for these purposes unless you enable these cookies again. Wilson Elser does not sell or share personal information in any other manner.

Limit Use of Sensitive Personal Information: If we collect sensitive personal information, you may limit its use to only what is necessary to provide requested services by adjusting your preferences here. Please contact privacy@wilsonelser.com with any questions.

Global Privacy Control: We honor browser-based opt-out signals, such as the Global Privacy Control (GPC). If we detect such a signal, your opt-out preference will be automatically applied.

These cookies are essential for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms.

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not function properly.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They may be set through our site by us or our analytics partners to understand your interests and deliver more relevant content to you. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site