News Briefs
The Best Lawyers in America 2026 Includes 140 Wilson Elser Attorneys
August 21, 2025
Obtained jury verdict in a case where plaintiff claimed damage to his aircraft was caused by client repair facility actions. Prior to trial, the court dismissed claims of conversion and statutory violations. During trial, the court dismissed the breach of contract claim in response to a motion for directed verdict, leaving the jury to decide the remaining claim of breach of bailment contract. After two hours, the jury found unanimously in favor of our clients. The Supreme Court of Virginia denied plaintiff’s petition to appeal.
Obtained dismissal of major airline in response to its employee’s claim of negligence in failing to adequately sanitize the premises where mandatory training occurred, causing her to contract COVID-19 and transmit it to her husband. The employee’s husband allegedly died from COVID-19 shortly thereafter. The court agreed the airline did not owe a duty to the employee’s husband and dismissed the suit.
Obtained a unanimous defense verdict in a case in which the plaintiff alleged that an elevator's emergency backup power malfunctioned causing the elevator to "drop." With a demand of $1.9 million in damages, we convinced the court to exclude injuries suffered by another passenger and critical opinions of the plaintiff's elevator expert opinion due to a deficient expert designation under Virginia law.
Obtained dismissal of premises liability suit by responding to the complaint by filing a plea in bar based on the exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, arguing that the insureds met the definition of “statutory employer” under Va. Code § 65.2-307, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s suit barred.
Obtained a voluntary dismissal without any monetary consideration for a client involved in a fatal car accident that resulted in the death of the other vehicle’s driver and serious injuries to the passenger of that vehicle, the plaintiff. After interviewing numerous officers that responded to the scene and deposing an eyewitness to the incident, Wilson Elser attorneys convinced the plaintiff to dismiss the case without any monetary consideration.
Obtained dismissal of a premises liability case where the plaintiff sought $500,000 for injuries sustained after she allegedly slipped and fell at a public retail establishment. Kathryn first moved to quash service on the defendants because the proof of service was facially defective in two ways: 1) it identified a wrong physical address for the defendant, and 2) it identified someone who was not an authorized designate accepted service. The plaintiff missed the statute of limitations by naming improper parties as defendants and failing to notify the correct defendants of institution of the suit in a timely manner, and then failed to re-attempt service within the mandated period permitted by statute. Kathryn successfully moved to dismiss the entire case with prejudice.
Obtained jury verdict in a case where plaintiff claimed damage to his aircraft was caused by client repair facility actions. Prior to trial, the court dismissed claims of conversion and statutory violations. During trial, the court dismissed the breach of contract claim in response to a motion for directed verdict, leaving the jury to decide the remaining claim of breach of bailment contract. After two hours, the jury found unanimously in favor of our clients. The Supreme Court of Virginia denied plaintiff’s petition to appeal.
Obtained dismissal of major airline in response to its employee’s claim of negligence in failing to adequately sanitize the premises where mandatory training occurred, causing her to contract COVID-19 and transmit it to her husband. The employee’s husband allegedly died from COVID-19 shortly thereafter. The court agreed the airline did not owe a duty to the employee’s husband and dismissed the suit.
Obtained a unanimous defense verdict in a case in which the plaintiff alleged that an elevator's emergency backup power malfunctioned causing the elevator to "drop." With a demand of $1.9 million in damages, we convinced the court to exclude injuries suffered by another passenger and critical opinions of the plaintiff's elevator expert opinion due to a deficient expert designation under Virginia law.
Obtained dismissal of premises liability suit by responding to the complaint by filing a plea in bar based on the exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, arguing that the insureds met the definition of “statutory employer” under Va. Code § 65.2-307, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s suit barred.
Obtained a voluntary dismissal without any monetary consideration for a client involved in a fatal car accident that resulted in the death of the other vehicle’s driver and serious injuries to the passenger of that vehicle, the plaintiff. After interviewing numerous officers that responded to the scene and deposing an eyewitness to the incident, Wilson Elser attorneys convinced the plaintiff to dismiss the case without any monetary consideration.
Obtained dismissal of a premises liability case where the plaintiff sought $500,000 for injuries sustained after she allegedly slipped and fell at a public retail establishment. Kathryn first moved to quash service on the defendants because the proof of service was facially defective in two ways: 1) it identified a wrong physical address for the defendant, and 2) it identified someone who was not an authorized designate accepted service. The plaintiff missed the statute of limitations by naming improper parties as defendants and failing to notify the correct defendants of institution of the suit in a timely manner, and then failed to re-attempt service within the mandated period permitted by statute. Kathryn successfully moved to dismiss the entire case with prejudice.
Kathryn Anne Grace (Partner-Charlotte, NC) and Christine R. Hogan (Partner-Baltimore, MD) secured affirmance of a dismissal from the Appellate Court of Maryland on behalf of our global airline carrier client. The plaintiff, a passenger on our client’s flight, alleged the airline wrongfully removed him and his children from a domestic flight from Atlanta to Baltimore and, as a result, he was emotionally distressed. This segment of the trip was the final leg of a return flight from Italy, thus part of an international journey. The plaintiff claimed the airline unjustly accused him of uttering profanities at the crew and wrongfully ejected him, describing the family’s removal as "wrongful, unfair, unjust, malicious, and callous.” He sought to recover monetary damages for emotional distress.
In an 11-page opinion, the Appellate Court confirmed first that the Montreal Convention applied to the claim and second that the Convention did not recognize his claim as viable. The three-judge panel affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the passenger’s lawsuit against our client, explaining that the multinational treaty requires any cause of action to be predicated on a physical injury. The panel further observed that, even assuming the plaintiff had sustained a qualifying injury, his claims were time-barred as he filed beyond the two-year statute of limitations provided for by the Convention.
Kathryn Anne Grace and Christine R. Hogan
Kathryn Grace (Partner-Charlotte, NC), Nicole Melvani (Partner-McLean, VA), and Thomas Tutone (Associate-McLean, VA) obtained dismissal with prejudice of an aviation matter on behalf of Wilson Elser’s client, a student pilot. The case arose out of an airplane crash that resulted in the death of the certified flight instructor, as well as injuries to the client and a teenage passenger. The certified flight instructor’s estate filed a wrongful death claim against our client, who was participating in his first day of flight instruction through a university aviation program on the day of the accident. The amended complaint alleged that the student pilot was nervous and unprepared, and caused a stall during takeoff. Kathryn and Nicole successfully argued against this. In particular, the amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief because it did not allege that the client breached any duty owed under Federal Aviation Regulations. Importantly, and in support of an argument for dismissal with prejudice, they also argued the certified flight instructor was the pilot in command and bore ultimate responsibility for the operation of the aircraft at the time of the accident, and for ensuring the student was adequately prepared for the training flight. While this was a tragic accident, the certified flight instructor’s estate could not sustain a claim for negligence against her student for failure to state a claim and any amendment would be futile. The Court agreed and dismissed the action against our student pilot client in its entirety, with prejudice.
Kathryn Anne Grace, Nicole T. Melvani and Thomas Tutone
Kathryn A. Grace (Partner-McLean, VA) and Nakea Barksdale (Associate-Baltimore, MD) secured a defense verdict in a breach of contract dispute where the plaintiff alleged he was incorrectly charged for a membership pass offered by our airline client. The plaintiff claimed that he intended to purchase a discounted membership pass but was charged for a higher-tier pass. Through meticulous cross-examination at trial, Nakea demonstrated that the plaintiff not only purchased the premium membership pass but also used its benefits immediately, booking a flight at a significantly reduced fare. Despite the plaintiff's argument, he was unable to provide any documentation to support his claim of an incorrect charge. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the airline, reinforcing the accuracy of its records and its fulfillment of the contractual terms.
Kathryn Anne Grace and Nakea J. Barksdale
Kathryn Grace (Partner-Charlotte, NC) and Nicole Melvani (Of Counsel-McLean, VA) prevailed in a seminal case before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, obtaining an Order affirming the grant of summary judgment in favor of a private jet charter company. The Court agreed with Kathryn and Nicole that the Montreal Convention, an international treaty that governs the international carriage of cargo by air, preempted the plaintiffs’ state law claims. The plaintiffs contracted with our client to transport passengers and cargo from Oregon to Switzerland. At a refueling stop in North Carolina, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized and ultimately destroyed the cargo on the grounds that it contained illegal marijuana. The plaintiffs contended that the product being transported was legal hemp and was wrongfully detained and destroyed by the government. The plaintiffs alleged that the charter company’s failure to submit proper customs paperwork resulted in the cargo’s detention and destruction, asserting causes of action for negligence, gross negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. The Fourth Circuit agreed with our argument, finding all of the plaintiffs’ claims fell within the preemptive scope of the Montreal Convention’s provisions and rejecting the plaintiffs’ various attempts to characterize the claims as outside of the Convention’s scope. The Fourth Circuit’s decision will have a significant impact on claims involving international transport.
Kathryn Anne Grace and Nicole T. Melvani
Kathryn Grace (Partner-McLean, VA) prevailed in a bench trial involving a multifaceted claim pertaining to a passenger’s luggage. The passenger sought to advance a claim of negligence and breach of warranty for two pieces of luggage – one of which was replaced with an alleged faulty bag and one of which was damaged in transit on a different flight. At trial, Kathryn argued that the claim was barred by accord and satisfaction and that the Contract of Carriage contained a Limitations of Liability clause preventing recovery. The trial court agreed and found for the airline client. The passenger appealed and a de novo trial occurred at which the court ruled in favor of the aviation client citing the same grounds. The passenger again appealed, but the Supreme Court of Maryland declined to hear the case.
Kathryn Anne Grace
Kathryn A. Grace (Partner-McLean, VA) obtained a unanimous defense verdict for a major airline client before the U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania in a case alleging that an intoxicated passenger assaulted another passenger. Law360 featured the case in the September 23, 2022, issue of Law360.com after the jury unanimously found in favor of the airline carrier.
Kathryn Anne Grace
Obtained jury verdict in a case where plaintiff claimed damage to his aircraft was caused by client repair facility actions. Prior to trial, the court dismissed claims of conversion and statutory violations. During trial, the court dismissed the breach of contract claim in response to a motion for directed verdict, leaving the jury to decide the remaining claim of breach of bailment contract. After two hours, the jury found unanimously in favor of our clients. The Supreme Court of Virginia denied plaintiff’s petition to appeal.
Obtained dismissal of major airline in response to its employee’s claim of negligence in failing to adequately sanitize the premises where mandatory training occurred, causing her to contract COVID-19 and transmit it to her husband. The employee’s husband allegedly died from COVID-19 shortly thereafter. The court agreed the airline did not owe a duty to the employee’s husband and dismissed the suit.
Obtained a unanimous defense verdict in a case in which the plaintiff alleged that an elevator's emergency backup power malfunctioned causing the elevator to "drop." With a demand of $1.9 million in damages, we convinced the court to exclude injuries suffered by another passenger and critical opinions of the plaintiff's elevator expert opinion due to a deficient expert designation under Virginia law.
Obtained dismissal of premises liability suit by responding to the complaint by filing a plea in bar based on the exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, arguing that the insureds met the definition of “statutory employer” under Va. Code § 65.2-307, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s suit barred.
Obtained a voluntary dismissal without any monetary consideration for a client involved in a fatal car accident that resulted in the death of the other vehicle’s driver and serious injuries to the passenger of that vehicle, the plaintiff. After interviewing numerous officers that responded to the scene and deposing an eyewitness to the incident, Wilson Elser attorneys convinced the plaintiff to dismiss the case without any monetary consideration.
Obtained dismissal of a premises liability case where the plaintiff sought $500,000 for injuries sustained after she allegedly slipped and fell at a public retail establishment. Kathryn first moved to quash service on the defendants because the proof of service was facially defective in two ways: 1) it identified a wrong physical address for the defendant, and 2) it identified someone who was not an authorized designate accepted service. The plaintiff missed the statute of limitations by naming improper parties as defendants and failing to notify the correct defendants of institution of the suit in a timely manner, and then failed to re-attempt service within the mandated period permitted by statute. Kathryn successfully moved to dismiss the entire case with prejudice.