nicholas.noto@wilsonelser.com

Download my vCard

Download my Bio

Nicholas Noto represents established businesses and individuals in all aspects of civil litigation. His practice focuses on the defense of claims related to general liability, premises liability, personal injury and construction law.

Nicholas is part of a team that defends virtually every type of premises liability and personal liability claim on behalf of some of the world’s largest insurance carriers and scores of organizations that retain Wilson Elser’s services directly. With offices strategically located throughout the United States, our attorneys are able to handle any type of dispute, whether straightforward and local or complex and multijurisdictional.

    Education

    • Widener University Delaware Law School (J.D., 2021)
      • CALI Award in Legal Writing
    • Moravian University (B.A., 2018)
      • Gamma Sigma Alpha Honor Society

    Bar Admissions

    • Pennsylvania
    • New Jersey
    • New York

    Court Admissions

    • U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Nicholas G. Noto

Greenfield & Noto Secure Dismissal of Premises Liability Claim Pending in Philadelphia County

Ben Greenfield (Partner-Philadelphia, PA) and Nicholas Noto (Associate-Philadelphia, PA) secured a victory in Philadelphia County for Wilson Elser’s clients, a property management group and a commercial/residential apartment owner after motion practice that lasted an entire calendar year. The plaintiff in this matter alleged injuries she sustained while on a residential property owned and managed by Wilson Elser’s clients. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a vaguely pled and legally impossible complaint in response to which Ben and Nicholas filed preliminary objections that the court sustained. The plaintiff subsequently filed four amended complaints, purported to be more specifically pled each time – but they were not. After the court dismissed each of the four complaints, Ben and Nicholas team filed a Motion to Prevent Further Amended Complaints, which was sustained by the court, and a final order was entered in favor of dismissing our clients with prejudice. The court’s ruling thwarted a demand in the high six figures and affirmed the precedent that pleadings in Philadelphia County must be legally plausible and pled with specificity.

Benjamin D. Greenfield and Nicholas G. Noto