News Briefs
123 Wilson Elser Attorneys Named to The Best Lawyers in America 2027 List
August 20, 2026
Peder Rigsby leads a multidisciplinary team of accomplished attorneys in defense of businesses, entities, and individuals facing complex casualty, commercial litigation, and discrimination claims in state and federal courts in the Pacific Northwest. He performs national counsel work for large clients based in the area, providing innovative and timely strategic counsel to help them make better-informed decisions, resolve complex legal challenges, and achieve specific business goals. Peder draws on Wilson Elser’s deep resources and national footprint to handle high-value, multijurisdictional, and complex cases.
Peder makes a deliberate effort to understand his clients’ businesses and develops a strategy to address their goals cost-effectively. He is often called upon for his ability to successfully handle first-party insurance defense cases. He has built a strong practice defending clients in litigation involving wrongful death and catastrophic injury, professional malpractice, discrimination issues, product liability, and multiparty construction defects. Peder also has experience handling real property disputes in Oregon, including quiet title and boundary matters.
Before becoming an attorney, Peder worked for more than a decade with Costco in various management roles. While engaging with attorneys on litigating workers’ compensation claims, he was inspired to pursue a career in law. His time in the private sector instilled the importance of the client service experience and shaped his client-centric approach. Peder’s later roles as a judicial extern for Michigan Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman and law clerk to the Honorable Christopher Yates and the Honorable Kathleen Feeney of the 17th Circuit Court of Kent County provided him with a sound foundation and a broad range of legal experience.
Oregon Association of Defense Counsel
Peder Rigsby leads a multidisciplinary team of accomplished attorneys in defense of businesses, entities, and individuals facing complex casualty, commercial litigation, and discrimination claims in state and federal courts in the Pacific Northwest. He performs national counsel work for large clients based in the area, providing innovative and timely strategic counsel to help them make better-informed decisions, resolve complex legal challenges, and achieve specific business goals. Peder draws on Wilson Elser’s deep resources and national footprint to handle high-value, multijurisdictional, and complex cases.
Peder makes a deliberate effort to understand his clients’ businesses and develops a strategy to address their goals cost-effectively. He is often called upon for his ability to successfully handle first-party insurance defense cases. He has built a strong practice defending clients in litigation involving wrongful death and catastrophic injury, professional malpractice, discrimination issues, product liability, and multiparty construction defects. Peder also has experience handling real property disputes in Oregon, including quiet title and boundary matters.
Before becoming an attorney, Peder worked for more than a decade with Costco in various management roles. While engaging with attorneys on litigating workers’ compensation claims, he was inspired to pursue a career in law. His time in the private sector instilled the importance of the client service experience and shaped his client-centric approach. Peder’s later roles as a judicial extern for Michigan Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman and law clerk to the Honorable Christopher Yates and the Honorable Kathleen Feeney of the 17th Circuit Court of Kent County provided him with a sound foundation and a broad range of legal experience.
The Portland, Oregon, team of Peder Rigsby (Partner-Portland, OR), Matthew Casey (Of Counsel-Portland, OR), Mark Firmin (Associate-Portland, OR), and Sean McKean (Associate-Portland, OR) secured a defense verdict on behalf of Wilson Elser’s client, a health care insurer, before the Commercial Arbitration Tribunal of the American Arbitration Association. The matter involved a contract dispute between an Alaska hospital system and our client arising from alleged underpayments of health care claims. The disagreement concerned the reimbursement methodology the client used to pay the disputed claims, which involved technical health care provider reimbursement issues and contract interpretation principles under Alaska law. The hospital alleged the client underpaid the disputed claims by $550,000.
After a four-day hearing, the arbitrator issued a defense verdict in favor of our client, agreeing that the insurer did not breach the provider agreement with the hospital. Peder and the Wilson Elser team presented compelling evidence of nearly 20 years of consistent performance between the parties, supporting our client’s interpretation of the contract and demonstrating that the hospital never raised concerns during annual contract negotiations. Through expert testimony, the team also established that the client’s practices were consistent with industry standards. This significant win for the client avoided an adverse result that would have exposed the client to future claims well into the seven-figure range; the award forecloses that risk.
Peder A. Rigsby, Matthew C. Casey, Mark J. Firmin and Sean McKean
Peder Rigsby (Partner-Portland, OR), Dan Mooney (Partner-Seattle, WA) and John Carley (Of Counsel-Portland, OR) secured a highly favorable jury award on behalf of their client, a large resource recovery company. The trial was held in King County, WA, a notoriously difficult venue for defendants recently included on the “Judicial Hellhole Top 10” list. This was an admitted liability case that was vigorously contested.
The client’s garbage truck driver backed into the plaintiff’s vehicle, causing it minor damage. Plaintiff was standing in the truck bed and either jumped or fell out. Plaintiff claimed numerous catastrophic injuries, including multiple surgeries and a concussion diagnosed nearly five years after the accident. The alleged economic damages were $1.2 million. During jury selection, Plaintiff’s counsel anchored at $30 million. In closing, Plaintiff asked for $11.8 million. The defense strategy focused on causation and the plaintiff’s credibility, which included presenting numerous experts, a private investigator, and hours of video surveillance showing the plaintiff engaging in activities that he claimed he could not perform. Following a three-week trial, the jury returned a verdict of $500,000 or $100,000 less than our last offer.
Peder A. Rigsby, Daniel C. Mooney and John Carley