Andrew J. Heck (Partner-Madison, NJ) discusses guidance gleaned from the limited body of case law regarding implied warranties in the December 17, 2024, posting of New Jersey Law Journal. Andrew states: “Regardless of the specific theory, the essential question that must be examined will remain the same – whether an alleged misrepresentation more accurately fits in the bucket of ‘I did not get what I paid for,’ as opposed to ‘the product did not work.’ Given the nature of New Jersey’s Products Liability Act presumption analysis, whether implied warranty claims can proceed in a product liability setting should be expected to be the subject of extensive dispositive motion practice and resulting decisions in the years to come.