Sarena Kustic defends large corporate entities against serious injury and wrongful death claims, including high-exposure matters. She also represents individuals and businesses in contractual and property disputes. Sarena prides herself on efficiency and effectiveness in the courtroom and in pursuit of an informal resolution.

Sarena has represented plaintiffs and defendants in an expansive variety of civil matters, including breach of contract and warranty, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, trade secrets, discrimination, premises liability, products liability, personal injury, unfair competition, consumer legal remedies, subrogation, collections, and enforcement of mechanics liens and judgments.

Sarena excels in all stages of litigation through trial, as well as mediation, arbitration and appellate practice. She effectively applies her broad range of skills and abilities to every case she handles, from inception to conclusion.

Areas of Focus

Commercial Litigation
Sarena defends businesses and corporations in contract, warranty and product liability actions. She also provides clients with strategic counsel to help them make better-informed decisions, resolve complex legal challenges and achieve specific business goals.

Securities
Sarena handles claims that arise in the securities and financial services industries, including regulatory inquiries and enforcement actions, customer disputes and intra-industry disputes.

Aviation
Sarena defends litigation arising from product issues and aviation-related injuries, as well as cases involving aircraft crashes and wrongful death. She is a member of a team with national reach that immediately provides guidance through an NTSB investigation, identification and preservation of relevant documents and electronic information, counsel on remedial measures, retention of relevant outside forensic experts, and preparation for litigation and trial.

Appellate
With the skills to effectively challenge or defend lower-court decisions and assist clients in bringing the litigation cycle to a satisfactory conclusion, Sarena works with the firm’s dedicated Appellate Practice to provide forceful arguments and innovative resolutions.

    Education

    • California Western School of Law (J.D., 2013)
    • University of Redlands (B.S. in Business, 2009)

    Bar Admissions

    • California

    Court Admissions

    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    • U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
    • U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    • U.S. District Court, Southern District of California

    Professional Affiliations

    • Association of Business Trial Lawyers
    • San Diego Defense Lawyers
    • Women in Business, San Diego

    Awards & Honors

    Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® Ones to Watch™, 2024-2025

Sarena Kustic

Sarena Kustic defends large corporate entities against serious injury and wrongful death claims, including high-exposure matters. She also represents individuals and businesses in contractual and property disputes. Sarena prides herself on efficiency and effectiveness in the courtroom and in pursuit of an informal resolution.

Sarena has represented plaintiffs and defendants in an expansive variety of civil matters, including breach of contract and warranty, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, trade secrets, discrimination, premises liability, products liability, personal injury, unfair competition, consumer legal remedies, subrogation, collections, and enforcement of mechanics liens and judgments.

Sarena excels in all stages of litigation through trial, as well as mediation, arbitration and appellate practice. She effectively applies her broad range of skills and abilities to every case she handles, from inception to conclusion.

Sarena Kustic

Ready and Kustic Secure Defense Verdict in Case of Alleged Fraudulent Inducement

Marty Ready (Partner-San Diego | San Francisco, CA) and Sarena Kustic (Partner-San Diego, CA) secured a defense verdict in a two-week jury trial in San Diego Superior Court. The case involved a disgruntled shareholder seeking recovery of his $1 million investment lost due to a failed startup. The plaintiff alleged fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and rescission against our clients, the former chairman of the board and the failed startup. Although the claims in this trial were based on fraud in the inducement, the plaintiff sought to insert derivative issues (currently the subject of a derivative lawsuit pending in Delaware Chancery Court) in an effort to confuse the jury in the hopes of obtaining a favorable verdict. Fortunately, Marty and Sarena and their team were able to keep the record clean, and the jury focused on only the issues in this case. The jury deliberated for less than three hours and returned a verdict in favor of our clients, never getting past the first question for each cause of action. After the verdict was rendered, the jurors advised counsel that our cross-examination of plaintiff’s witnesses was very effective in demonstrating their lack of credibility and our trial presentation was highly persuasive and professional. 

Marty B. Ready and Sarena Kustic

Kearns and Kustic Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice at the Pleadings Stage

Patrick Kearns (Partner-San Diego) and Sarena Kustic (Of Counsel-San Diego) obtained dismissal of a complaint with prejudice in a case before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case involved allegations of discrimination arising from the plaintiff’s removal from a flight and being banned from using a national airline, Wilson Elser’s client. Patrick and Sarena removed the state court case to the Eastern District of California, then moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The court granted the motion but gave the pro se plaintiff leave to amend. Instead of filing and amended complaint, the plaintiff filed a new state court action adding more causes of action to the complaint. Patrick and Sarena removed the case to federal court once more and filed a second motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. This time, they argued leave to amend would be futile because, despite the court providing the plaintiff with clear examples of how to plead his claims, the plaintiff’s new complaint contained the exact same defects as the prior one. The court agreed and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Patrick J. Kearns and Sarena Kustic

Kustic Granted Summary Judgment on Behalf of Major Credit Union

Sarena Kustic (Of Counsel-San Diego, CA) successfully moved for summary judgment resulting in a dismissal before Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of a major credit union client. The underlying breach of contract and negligence case stemmed from the plaintiff’s purchase of a vehicle using a cashier's check drawn from her account with Wilson Elser’s client. The dealership assumed the check was from loan proceeds and listed the credit union as a lienholder on the vehicle title (in addition to delivering the wrong vehicle to the plaintiff). Once the title error was discovered, the credit union executed the appropriate documents to remove its name from the vehicle title and returned it to the dealership. The plaintiff sued the dealership for breach of contract and named the credit union as a defendant alleging it fraudulently added itself to the vehicle title and created a loan obligation in the plaintiff’s name. Sarena tendered the defense to the dealership on equitable grounds, but the dealership refused, prompting a cross-complaint against the dealership for equitable indemnity. Despite the dealership admitting that its mistake was the reason our client was named on the title and no loan obligation was ever created, the plaintiff refused to dismiss the credit union from the case. Sarena moved the court for summary judgment and succeeded in obtaining a dismissal in favor of our client. Thereafter, Sarena successfully negotiated settlement of the cross-complaint against the dealership resulting in a substantial amount of attorney fees recovered from the dealership.

Sarena Kustic

Kearns and Kustic Vacate Seven-Figure Default Judgment and Then Obtain Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice

Patrick Kearns (Partner-San Diego) and Sarena Kustic (Of Counsel-San Diego) successfully vacated a seven-figure default judgment, and thereafter obtained a dismissal of the complaint with prejudice. The underlying case, filed in 2017, involved a claim against a hospital, a surgeon and Wilson Elser’s client, a national medical air transportation provider. The plaintiff alleged she sustained injuries during surgery that were exacerbated by a delay in medical transport. In 2018, the hospital and surgeon were dismissed at the pleadings stage. By 2021, the plaintiff obtained a default judgment against our client, and nearly a year and a half later the plaintiff served the client with a notice of judgment. Patrick and Sarena moved to vacate the default and default judgment, and quash the false return of service, on the grounds that the plaintiff had served some entity other than the client’s registered agent for service of process in California. On the eve of the opposition’s deadline, the plaintiff stipulated to vacate the default and quash service. Thereafter, Patrick and Sarena moved to dismiss the complaint due to the plaintiff’s failure to effectuate personal service within California’s mandatory period of three years from the date the complaint was filed. The court agreed and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Patrick J. Kearns and Sarena Kustic

Aviation Team Obtain Defense Verdict in Case Arising from Special Ops Helicopter Crash

Patrick Kearns (Partner-San Diego) and Sarena Kustic (Of Counsel–San Diego) obtained a defense verdict following a six-day jury trial in Federal Court in the Central District of Los Angeles. The case stemmed from a 2014 crash of a Sikorsky MH-60 Special Operations Helicopter flown by the United States Army’s 160th SOAR Division on base at Fort Hunter, Georgia. Litigation against numerous parties were ultimately separated, and litigated in different venues around the country. Wilson Elser’s client manufactured and sold a tactical transponder and emergency locator transmitter (ELT) which the 160th had installed on the aircraft. Upon impact, the ELT did not transmit a signal and the plaintiffs alleged it was defectively designed and manufactured, resulting in a delay of first responders to the site of the crash and resulting injuries. The original suit was filed in 2014, and the case against Wilson Elser’s client was stayed for approximately five years due to the bankruptcy of a co-defendant. A jury trial finally proceeded in mid-July 2023. After the conclusion of evidence and argument, the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict after approximately 45 minutes of deliberation. 

Patrick J. Kearns and Sarena Kustic

Kearns and Kustic Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in a Premises Liability Case against National Airline

Patrick Kearns (Partner-San Diego) and Sarena Kustic (Of Counsel-San Diego) obtained dismissal of a case with prejudice at the pleadings stage. The case involved allegations of personal injuries stemming from an employee of Wilson Elser’s client, a national airline, playing with a remote control car outside the airline’s hangar. The plaintiff claimed the remote control car struck his foot at a high rate of speed and caused severe injuries. Patrick and Sarena succeeded in removing the state court case to the Northern District of California, then moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff filed a late opposition and failed to respond to the court’s order to show cause. The court dismissed the case without prejudice. Six days after the statute of limitations expired, the plaintiff filed the same complaint once again in state court, and Patrick and Sarena removed the case to the Northern District once more. They then moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and included an argument based on the expiration of the statutory period. The plaintiff again missed the deadline to oppose and failed to respond to the court’s order to show cause. The court thereafter granted the defense’s motion and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Patrick J. Kearns and Sarena Kustic

Privacy Settings
Your Privacy Choices
We value your privacy. Under privacy laws in your jurisdiction, you have the right to control how your personal information is used, including the right to opt out of the “sale” or “sharing” of your personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. You may also limit the use of your sensitive personal information.

Below, you can review and adjust your cookie and data sharing preferences. For more information about how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy.

Your Rights and Choices

Opt Out of Sale or Sharing: You may opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising and analytics purposes by turning off Advertising & Targeting Cookies. We will honor your choice and will not sell or share your personal information for these purposes unless you enable these cookies again. Wilson Elser does not sell or share personal information in any other manner.

Limit Use of Sensitive Personal Information: If we collect sensitive personal information, you may limit its use to only what is necessary to provide requested services by adjusting your preferences here. Please contact privacy@wilsonelser.com with any questions.

Global Privacy Control: We honor browser-based opt-out signals, such as the Global Privacy Control (GPC). If we detect such a signal, your opt-out preference will be automatically applied.
These cookies are essential for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They may be set through our site by us or our analytics partners to understand your interests and deliver more relevant content to you. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site