stephanie.freeman@wilsonelser.com

Download my vCard

Download my Bio

Stephanie Freeman defends high-exposure, complex medical malpractice claims against health care systems, hospitals, nursing homes, doctors, nurses and other health care professionals. She represents major New York hospitals as well as large health care systems in surrounding counties. Specialists include cardiologists, gastroenterologists, infectious disease physicians, neurologists, ophthalmologists, surgeons and vascular disease physicians. Stephanie handles the day- to-day management of medical malpractice litigation from inception to disposition, including advocating in court, drafting motions, leading and defending depositions, conducting mediations and preparing for trials. She has drafted successful motions for summary judgment and dismissal in cases of high sustainable value, and second-chaired six cases in New York State Supreme Court to defense verdict. Stephanie is a peer mentor to junior associates firmwide on medical malpractice and various other areas of the law.

Stephanie lived in Sydney, Australia, for six months and worked as a parliamentary intern for an Upper House Member of the New South Wales Parliament, where she formulated an anti-smoking campaign that was presented to Parliament. She is a committed, dedicated team player who listens to concerns and recommends strategies for successful outcomes.

    Education

    • Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University (J.D., 2004)
      • Intensive Trial Advocacy Program; Bet Tzedek Legal Services Clinic
    • Emory University Goizueta Business School (B.B.A., 2001)

    Bar Admissions

    • New York
    • New Jersey

    Awards & Honors

    • Selected for inclusion in Super Lawyers New York Rising Stars, 2014

Stephanie F. Freeman

Freeman MedMal Summary Judgment Victory Affirmed on Appeal ‒ NYC Appellate Team Leads the Charge

​Stephanie Freeman (Partner-New York, NY) secured summary judgment in the New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for Wilson Elser’s clients, a hospital and its ophthalmologist employee, in a medical malpractice action arising from cataract and vision correction surgeries.   The plaintiff underwent cataract and vision correction surgery that failed to improve her vision, followed by revision surgery that left her with complications.  But, as demonstrated by the submission Stephanie prepared and the accompanying expert affirmation supporting the care rendered, the clients’ care and treatment rendered fully conformed to the applicable standard of care. As the defense expert acknowledged, a corrective lens predicted to be the appropriate strength for a patient can sometimes prove to be the wrong strength despite proper care. Similarly, complications can arise during surgery in the absence of negligence ‒ and that is what occurred here.

The plaintiff’s expert nevertheless argued that the clients had erroneously selected the lens because it ultimately proved to be the wrong strength. Stephanie successfully exposed the hindsight inherent in that argument: the fact that an outcome was unsuccessful does not establish that the care was negligent. The court agreed, granting summary judgment to Wilson Elser’s physician client and hospital, and dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiff appealed both the summary judgment order and the resulting judgment. Judy Selmeci (|Partner-New York, NY) and Julia Audibert (Associate-New York, NY) prepared the appellate brief, continuing to emphasize that the plaintiff had failed to identify any departure from the standard of care. Patrick Lawless (Partner-New York, NY) handled the oral argument, where the appellate team’s arguments were well received. The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal from the summary judgment order and affirmed the judgment, leaving the victory for Wilson Elser’s clients intact.

Stephanie F. Freeman, Julia Audibert, Judy C. Selmeci and Patrick J. Lawless

Privacy Settings