News Briefs
Dougherty and Granata Achieve Defense Verdict and Full Exoneration for Medical Equipment Distributor
March 29, 2022
National Counsel Experience
Secured favorable resolution of a five-count fraud claim on behalf of an international travel agency. Convinced plaintiffs to honor forum selection clause in highly defense-receptive Bucks County, Pennsylvania and subsequently to dismiss the entire lawsuit with prejudice.
Passenger and light truck tires, National Defense of two Asia tire manufacturers
National coordination of Japanese diagnostic medical equipment products defense
Coordination of several Chinese equipment manufacturers’ claims and product liability suits in the United States
CPSC counsel for several manufacturers in the implementation of CPSC “Fast Track” recalls.
Obtained summary judgment when retained to represent a major Japanese bike component manufacturer in defense of a component that had been the subject of an earlier CPSC mandatory recall. The plaintiff sued the American subsidiary that was only involved in after-market support, but did not design or manufacturer the product. We successfully argued that this company was not in the chain of distribution and secured a dismissal of the American company, as the plaintiff tried to secure service over the Japanese manufacturer under the Hague Convention. The court kept the plaintiff to a strict time frame for trial since we had promptly notified the plaintiff of the correct manufacturer early in the case. His lack of diligence secured our client a further and final dismissal.
In a recent Ninth Circuit victory, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Nevada Federal Court's summary judgment in favor of our client, the manufacturer of a blood pressure cuff monitor. The plaintiff alleged that he ceased his use of blood pressure medications in reliance on favorable readings of the device, which he claimed were faulty, allegedly resulting in a stroke to the plaintiff. We successfully argued that the plaintiff had failed to present expert proof of a defect or causally connect our device to his stroke. His own doctor testified that his medically ill-advised ceasing of his medications and holistic meds caused his stroke. The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment, but did struggle with the issue of Nevada law on whether expert testimony was needed to prove defect. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari.
Nominal (less than cost of defense) resolution in several products suits involving bicycle pedals and paper shredder cases premised upon claims of design defects and failure to warn.
Secured a dismissal of a Chinese handlebar stem manufacturer in Texas Federal Court. The handlebar maker sued our clients, the U.S. distribution subsidiary of the Chinese manufacturer. While they were in the chain of distribution, they did not sell to Texas (only to two U.S. distributors. After jurisdictional discovery, including the deposition of our client's president, the federal court agreed that under the recent USSC decision in Narcisco v McIntyre, our client had not purposefully availed itself of doing business in Texas and affirmed our client's dismissal.
California dismissal of a Japanese industrial wheel-forming manufacturer.
Full dismissal of radiation exposure cases on behalf of our client, a Japanese diagnostic medical device manufacturer.
Commercial advice for several Asian clients, including warranty language; contract drafting, business negotiations, dealer agreements and commercial leases.
National Counsel Experience
Secured favorable resolution of a five-count fraud claim on behalf of an international travel agency. Convinced plaintiffs to honor forum selection clause in highly defense-receptive Bucks County, Pennsylvania and subsequently to dismiss the entire lawsuit with prejudice.
Passenger and light truck tires, National Defense of two Asia tire manufacturers
National coordination of Japanese diagnostic medical equipment products defense
Coordination of several Chinese equipment manufacturers’ claims and product liability suits in the United States
CPSC counsel for several manufacturers in the implementation of CPSC “Fast Track” recalls.
Obtained summary judgment when retained to represent a major Japanese bike component manufacturer in defense of a component that had been the subject of an earlier CPSC mandatory recall. The plaintiff sued the American subsidiary that was only involved in after-market support, but did not design or manufacturer the product. We successfully argued that this company was not in the chain of distribution and secured a dismissal of the American company, as the plaintiff tried to secure service over the Japanese manufacturer under the Hague Convention. The court kept the plaintiff to a strict time frame for trial since we had promptly notified the plaintiff of the correct manufacturer early in the case. His lack of diligence secured our client a further and final dismissal.
In a recent Ninth Circuit victory, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Nevada Federal Court's summary judgment in favor of our client, the manufacturer of a blood pressure cuff monitor. The plaintiff alleged that he ceased his use of blood pressure medications in reliance on favorable readings of the device, which he claimed were faulty, allegedly resulting in a stroke to the plaintiff. We successfully argued that the plaintiff had failed to present expert proof of a defect or causally connect our device to his stroke. His own doctor testified that his medically ill-advised ceasing of his medications and holistic meds caused his stroke. The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment, but did struggle with the issue of Nevada law on whether expert testimony was needed to prove defect. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari.
Nominal (less than cost of defense) resolution in several products suits involving bicycle pedals and paper shredder cases premised upon claims of design defects and failure to warn.
Secured a dismissal of a Chinese handlebar stem manufacturer in Texas Federal Court. The handlebar maker sued our clients, the U.S. distribution subsidiary of the Chinese manufacturer. While they were in the chain of distribution, they did not sell to Texas (only to two U.S. distributors. After jurisdictional discovery, including the deposition of our client's president, the federal court agreed that under the recent USSC decision in Narcisco v McIntyre, our client had not purposefully availed itself of doing business in Texas and affirmed our client's dismissal.
California dismissal of a Japanese industrial wheel-forming manufacturer.
Full dismissal of radiation exposure cases on behalf of our client, a Japanese diagnostic medical device manufacturer.
Commercial advice for several Asian clients, including warranty language; contract drafting, business negotiations, dealer agreements and commercial leases.
Partners Paul Dougherty (Los Angeles, CA), Greg Lee (Los Angeles, CA), and Taylor Allin (Phoenix, AZ) with Shirley Jin (Of Counsel-Los Angeles, CA) prevailed on a Rule 12 motion to dismiss in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona on behalf of a Chinese tire manufacturer based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The lawsuit arose from a highway rollover accident in which the rear tire of the plaintiff’s motorcycle, which had been manufactured at the client’s plant in Jiangsu, China, experienced a tread/belt separation. The plaintiff argued that the Chinese client had sufficient minimum contacts with Arizona based on, among other things, marketing and sales throughout the United States, a website, authorized retailers in Arizona, and the issuance of a recall by a domestic subsidiary that allegedly impacted Arizona. After taking the motion to dismiss under submission for more than nine months, the district judge ultimately agreed with the defense team that the plaintiff had failed to meet his burden of establishing sufficient minimum contacts with Arizona, and granted their motion to dismiss without leave to amend.
E. Paul Dougherty, Jr., Gregory K. Lee, Taylor H. Allin and Xiao Wen (Shirley) Jin