Lauren Zink concentrates her practice in the areas of general liability, personal injury, property loss and New York Labor Law. Her primary clients consist of insurance carriers, municipal entities, property owners, property management companies and construction companies. Lauren is a member of Wilson Elser’s National Trial Team and has achieved certification in the firm’s rigorous National Mock Trial Program, through which our most successful trial lawyers impart their knowledge to those destined to join their ranks.

Lauren has handled dozens of construction accidents governed by New York’s Labor Law statues. Her in-depth knowledge of the law in this area coupled with her years of experience have enabled her to achieve successful outcomes for her clients. Many of Lauren’s cases present high exposure, and she works with her clients to understand their goals in each case and develop a strategy designed to meet and exceed their goal. Through risk transfer tools, careful review of construction contracts, close study of medical records and the knowledge gained from conducting hundreds of depositions, Lauren is able to identify key evidence that she exploits for use in dispositive motions and as leverage for settlement discussions. Lauren has a particular skill in preparing and arguing dispositive motions in all types of negligence cases, and has succeeded in dismissing complaints in cases with the most challenging facts.

Prior to joining Wilson Elser, Lauren worked at a New York City medical malpractice defense firm serving doctors, hospitals and other health care providers, and before that, at an insurance defense firm focusing on Labor Law and general liability cases.

    Education

    • Albany Law School (J.D., 2012)
      • lead articles editor, Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology; teaching assistant, Torts and Property Law
    • The College of New Jersey (B.S., 2009)

    Bar Admissions

    • New York

    Court Admissions

    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

    Professional Affiliations

    • New York State Bar Association

    Awards & Honors

    Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® Ones to Watch™, 2026

Lauren M. Zink

Ross & Zink Secure Pre-Answer Dismissal of 106-Page Complaint in Federal Court

Mathew Ross (Partner-White Plains, NY) and Lauren Zink (Partner-New York, NY) obtained a pre-answer dismissal of a 106-page complaint in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiff alleged a litany of federal and New York state claims against Wilson Elser’s clients, a psychology group, and its psychologist employee, along with various other defendants. Allegations included RICO violations, deprivation of procedural due process, equal protection violations, conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, fraud/deceit, intentional/negligent infliction of emotional distress, professional malpractice, negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, and spoliation of evidence.

In this federal matter, the pro se plaintiff – an attorney –brought sweeping claims arising out of pending New York Family Court custody proceedings, alleging that a broad group of defendants, including our clients, the sitting Family Court judge, the plaintiff’s ex-wife and her counsel, court-appointed representatives, government agencies, and others engaged in a years-long scheme to violate his constitutional rights and interfere with his relationship with his daughter. As to our clients, the plaintiff alleged negligent hiring and supervision, claiming the psychology group’s employee, who was hired by the plaintiff and his wife together for a period between 2019 and 2020 to treat their daughter, falsified reports and records, triggering an investigation that led to the suspension of his custodial rights.

Prior to answering, Mat and Lauren filed a pre-answer motion seeking to dismiss the entirety of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), arguing for dismissal on multiple grounds. They maintained that the plaintiff’s federal claims against the client were barred pursuant to the Younger abstention and Rooker-Feldman doctrines. They further argued that the plaintiff’s New York State claims were subject to dismissal because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, coupled with the fact that the plaintiff’s New York State claims were time-barred pursuant to the respective statute of limitations.

In a 30-page decision, the court granted Mat and Lauren’s motion in full, agreeing that the Younger abstention doctrine barred the plaintiff’s federal claims because they interfered with ongoing state custody proceedings, and that the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations of bad faith were insufficient to overcome that bar. The court also found the claims precluded by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prohibits federal review of state court custody determinations. With respect to the plaintiff’s RICO and Section 1985(3) claims, the court dismissed these claims on the basis that they were conclusory, that the plaintiff did not adequately allege that any of the defendants are state actors, and that the plaintiff otherwise failed to sufficiently plead facts showing a plausible entitlement to relief.  Finally, the judge held that the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims, given that the anchoring federal claims were dismissed. As such, the judge directed the Clerk to enter judgment dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Mathew P. Ross and Lauren M. Zink

Your Privacy Choices
We value your privacy. Under privacy laws in your jurisdiction, you have the right to control how your personal information is used, including the right to opt out of the “sale” or “sharing” of your personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. You may also limit the use of your sensitive personal information.

Below, you can review and adjust your cookie and data sharing preferences. For more information about how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy.

Your Rights and Choices

Opt Out of Sale or Sharing: You may opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising and analytics purposes by turning off Advertising & Targeting Cookies. We will honor your choice and will not sell or share your personal information for these purposes unless you enable these cookies again. Wilson Elser does not sell or share personal information in any other manner.

Limit Use of Sensitive Personal Information: If we collect sensitive personal information, you may limit its use to only what is necessary to provide requested services by adjusting your preferences here. Please contact privacy@wilsonelser.com with any questions.

Global Privacy Control: We honor browser-based opt-out signals, such as the Global Privacy Control (GPC). If we detect such a signal, your opt-out preference will be automatically applied.
These cookies are essential for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They may be set through our site by us or our analytics partners to understand your interests and deliver more relevant content to you. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site
Privacy Settings