Attorney Articles
NJLJ Publishes Terranova & Billek on Monetizing “Nighttime Companionship”
May 19, 2025 - New Jersey Law Journal
Meaningfully assisted in defending high-exposure products liability case against a major auto manufacturer that involved a plaintiff who sustained traumatic brain and spinal cord injury.
Drafted successful renewed motion for summary judgment on behalf of a leading global security and aerospace company that was pled into this wrongful death case on a theory of vicarious liability and a novel issue of whether an employee's use of a work phone, while commuting to work, places him within the course and scope of his employment.
Meaningfully assisted in defending high-exposure products liability case against a major auto manufacturer that involved a plaintiff who sustained traumatic brain and spinal cord injury.
Drafted successful renewed motion for summary judgment on behalf of a leading global security and aerospace company that was pled into this wrongful death case on a theory of vicarious liability and a novel issue of whether an employee's use of a work phone, while commuting to work, places him within the course and scope of his employment.
Maxwell Billek (Partner – Madison, NJ) and Melissa Terranova (Associate – Madison, NJ) secured a complete victory in a highly complex legal malpractice action pending in the New Jersey Superior Court, Monmouth County, on behalf of Wilson Elser’s client, a bankruptcy law firm.
The matter involved extensive and significant motion practice in a procedurally intricate case arising out of a prior bankruptcy proceeding. In moving for summary judgment, Max and Melissa advanced multiple independent procedural grounds for dismissal.
First, they established that the individual plaintiff lacked standing to assert legal malpractice claims because he was not the debtor in the underlying bankruptcy matter and therefore suffered no legally cognizable injury. Second, they demonstrated that the corporate plaintiff likewise lacked standing, as any potential claims belonged exclusively to the bankruptcy estate and could only be pursued by the trustee. Finally, they successfully argued that the Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claims arose directly from the administration of the bankruptcy estate and fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.
The court agreed on all grounds - including substantive grounds involving the lack of an attorney-client relationship. It granted summary judgment in favor of Wilson Elser’s client, dismissed all claims with prejudice on both procedural and substantive bases, and denied plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment in its entirety.
This result reflects a decisive and comprehensive defense victory in a sophisticated legal malpractice matter involving standing, bankruptcy-estate ownership of claims, and jurisdictional principles.
Maxwell L. Billek and Melissa C. Terranova