Newsletters
By Any Other Name: Rules Limiting Alternative Pleading in Professional Liability Actions
Q2 2025 - Professionally Speaking
William McDevitt centers his practice on professional liability defense, primarily focusing on attorneys, physicians, medical service corporations, architects, engineers, insurance brokers and accountants. Bill’s professional liability cases arise from both basic services and complex undertakings. Bill also has extensive litigation experience in invasion of privacy claims; libel and slander claims; premises liability; toxic tort (individual and class action); creditors’ rights (FDCPA, RESPA, FCEUA); consumer protection statutes (individual and class action); and employment disputes. Bill practices before administrative boards as well as state and federal courts.
Bill regularly mediates cases for Philadelphia County’s Eviction Diversion Program and acts as an arbitrator for Philadelphia County’s Complex Litigation Center. He is a past lecturer for the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Professional Liability Committee and actively participates on education initiatives through the Pennsylvania Bar Association.
Lawyers
Bill prides himself on delivering high-quality legal services to the most demanding clients – other lawyers. He defends attorneys in professional liability claims in Pennsylvania’s state and federal courts. Cases involve professional negligence, breach of contract, wrongful use of civil proceedings, abuse of process, libel, slander, invasion of privacy, RICO, bankruptcy, trusts and estates disputes, banking issues and regulatory suits, including claims brought under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
Banking & Financial
Bill supports Wilson Elser’s broad spectrum of banking and financial services, primarily through representing attorneys, officers and directors, and corporate clients in commercial litigation arising from judgment enforcement, securities issuance, bankruptcy representation, and creditors’ rights. Bill has extensive experience handling cases involving FDCPA, FCEUA, RESPA, and consumer credit claims. The firm draws on a multidisciplinary team of attorneys to approach complex financial issues from many angles, including professional liability, commercial transactions, bankruptcy, real estate and commercial litigation, to provide the best results for clients.
William McDevitt centers his practice on professional liability defense, primarily focusing on attorneys, physicians, medical service corporations, architects, engineers, insurance brokers and accountants. Bill’s professional liability cases arise from both basic services and complex undertakings. Bill also has extensive litigation experience in invasion of privacy claims; libel and slander claims; premises liability; toxic tort (individual and class action); creditors’ rights (FDCPA, RESPA, FCEUA); consumer protection statutes (individual and class action); and employment disputes. Bill practices before administrative boards as well as state and federal courts.
Bill regularly mediates cases for Philadelphia County’s Eviction Diversion Program and acts as an arbitrator for Philadelphia County’s Complex Litigation Center. He is a past lecturer for the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Professional Liability Committee and actively participates on education initiatives through the Pennsylvania Bar Association.
William McDevitt (Partner-Philadelphia, PA) obtained a summary judgment dismissal from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The matter involved an employee of a medical waste removal company who claimed to have slipped on a substance in the parking lot of a dialysis clinic.
Plaintiff alleged that he fell on a puddle of "goop" while moving boxes onto a panel truck. He purports that he lost consciousness and sustained injuries to his lower back, neck and wrist. He later underwent surgical removal of a right wrist ganglion that his physicians attributed to the fall. He subsequently went on disability and eventually settled a workers' compensation claim for $75,000.
Plaintiff was unable to establish the source of the substance and could not show the dialysis clinic had notice that it was there. On summary judgment, opposing counsel unsuccessfully argued a) the clinic had a duty to provide additional lighting in the parking lot area and b) the clinic may be assumed to have had constructive knowledge of the hazard because leaves were found on the substance. The Court rejected these arguments and granted summary judgment motions filed by both the clinic and its landlord.
William F. McDevitt