While Kathleen continually seeks and frequently achieves early resolutions, she is not afraid to elevate matters to court if it helps to advance her clients' objectives.  She has tried many cases to verdict at both the state and federal levels.

Defended two companies, which provide drug information, in more than 300 pharmaceutical cases in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and have obtained dismissals from over 65 cases to date.

Successfully defended a case against a clip manufacturer in state court in Cincinnati, OH. The plaintiff mother donated a kidney to her son and nearly died from the alleged failure of a clip used to close the renal artery, which led to severe bleeding and damage to all major organs. Duration of this highly technical case was several years, and a favorable outcome was obtained for the client. The demand was $20 million. This case was successfully mediated.

Reached nominal settlement of a New Jersey case against a catheter manufacturer.

Obtained a defense verdict in a New Jersey case against elevator maintenance company.

Obtained defense verdicts in mass tort cases in Philadelphia County on many occasions for lack of sufficient product identification or exposure by plaintiff to clients’ products. 

Successfully defended and obtained the dismissal of a latex manufacturer due to lack of involvement with latex in its gloves.

Tried a case in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court against a medical device spray company that settled shortly after cross-examination of the plaintiff.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in case involving a death and alleged brain injury allegedly sustained in an accident following the design and installation of an elevator.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million. Obtained dismissal of construction company and obtained nominal settlement for owner.

Successfully defended construction company in case involving a death following an alleged fall from a multi-story building during construction.  Case involved very complex indemnity and insurance issues with settlement demand of $20 million.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in suit involving electrical burns during installation of power to a construction site, resulting in dismissal of owner and nominal settlement for construction company.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million.

Obtained summary judgment on many occasions in favor of construction companies involving statutory employer defense.

Successfully defended against injunction sought to force insurer to pay insurance policy proceeds into court.

Obtained revision of insurance policy with dismissal of client insurer from suit.

Successfully defended insurance brokers on many occasions involving allegations of potential gap in coverage with dismissal of brokers from suits.

Obtained dismissal of insurance broker from suit pending in Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court seeking over a million dollars in damages if prize policy placed by broker did not cover casino winnings. 

Representative Matters

While Kathleen continually seeks and frequently achieves early resolutions, she is not afraid to elevate matters to court if it helps to advance her clients' objectives.  She has tried many cases to verdict at both the state and federal levels.

Defended two companies, which provide drug information, in more than 300 pharmaceutical cases in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and have obtained dismissals from over 65 cases to date.

Successfully defended a case against a clip manufacturer in state court in Cincinnati, OH. The plaintiff mother donated a kidney to her son and nearly died from the alleged failure of a clip used to close the renal artery, which led to severe bleeding and damage to all major organs. Duration of this highly technical case was several years, and a favorable outcome was obtained for the client. The demand was $20 million. This case was successfully mediated.

Reached nominal settlement of a New Jersey case against a catheter manufacturer.

Obtained a defense verdict in a New Jersey case against elevator maintenance company.

Obtained defense verdicts in mass tort cases in Philadelphia County on many occasions for lack of sufficient product identification or exposure by plaintiff to clients’ products. 

Successfully defended and obtained the dismissal of a latex manufacturer due to lack of involvement with latex in its gloves.

Tried a case in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court against a medical device spray company that settled shortly after cross-examination of the plaintiff.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in case involving a death and alleged brain injury allegedly sustained in an accident following the design and installation of an elevator.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million. Obtained dismissal of construction company and obtained nominal settlement for owner.

Successfully defended construction company in case involving a death following an alleged fall from a multi-story building during construction.  Case involved very complex indemnity and insurance issues with settlement demand of $20 million.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in suit involving electrical burns during installation of power to a construction site, resulting in dismissal of owner and nominal settlement for construction company.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million.

Obtained summary judgment on many occasions in favor of construction companies involving statutory employer defense.

Successfully defended against injunction sought to force insurer to pay insurance policy proceeds into court.

Obtained revision of insurance policy with dismissal of client insurer from suit.

Successfully defended insurance brokers on many occasions involving allegations of potential gap in coverage with dismissal of brokers from suits.

Obtained dismissal of insurance broker from suit pending in Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court seeking over a million dollars in damages if prize policy placed by broker did not cover casino winnings. 

Representative Matters

Events

While Kathleen continually seeks and frequently achieves early resolutions, she is not afraid to elevate matters to court if it helps to advance her clients' objectives.  She has tried many cases to verdict at both the state and federal levels.

Defended two companies, which provide drug information, in more than 300 pharmaceutical cases in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and have obtained dismissals from over 65 cases to date.

Successfully defended a case against a clip manufacturer in state court in Cincinnati, OH. The plaintiff mother donated a kidney to her son and nearly died from the alleged failure of a clip used to close the renal artery, which led to severe bleeding and damage to all major organs. Duration of this highly technical case was several years, and a favorable outcome was obtained for the client. The demand was $20 million. This case was successfully mediated.

Reached nominal settlement of a New Jersey case against a catheter manufacturer.

Obtained a defense verdict in a New Jersey case against elevator maintenance company.

Obtained defense verdicts in mass tort cases in Philadelphia County on many occasions for lack of sufficient product identification or exposure by plaintiff to clients’ products. 

Successfully defended and obtained the dismissal of a latex manufacturer due to lack of involvement with latex in its gloves.

Tried a case in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court against a medical device spray company that settled shortly after cross-examination of the plaintiff.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in case involving a death and alleged brain injury allegedly sustained in an accident following the design and installation of an elevator.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million. Obtained dismissal of construction company and obtained nominal settlement for owner.

Successfully defended construction company in case involving a death following an alleged fall from a multi-story building during construction.  Case involved very complex indemnity and insurance issues with settlement demand of $20 million.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in suit involving electrical burns during installation of power to a construction site, resulting in dismissal of owner and nominal settlement for construction company.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million.

Obtained summary judgment on many occasions in favor of construction companies involving statutory employer defense.

Successfully defended against injunction sought to force insurer to pay insurance policy proceeds into court.

Obtained revision of insurance policy with dismissal of client insurer from suit.

Successfully defended insurance brokers on many occasions involving allegations of potential gap in coverage with dismissal of brokers from suits.

Obtained dismissal of insurance broker from suit pending in Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court seeking over a million dollars in damages if prize policy placed by broker did not cover casino winnings. 

Events

While Kathleen continually seeks and frequently achieves early resolutions, she is not afraid to elevate matters to court if it helps to advance her clients' objectives.  She has tried many cases to verdict at both the state and federal levels.

Defended two companies, which provide drug information, in more than 300 pharmaceutical cases in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and have obtained dismissals from over 65 cases to date.

Successfully defended a case against a clip manufacturer in state court in Cincinnati, OH. The plaintiff mother donated a kidney to her son and nearly died from the alleged failure of a clip used to close the renal artery, which led to severe bleeding and damage to all major organs. Duration of this highly technical case was several years, and a favorable outcome was obtained for the client. The demand was $20 million. This case was successfully mediated.

Reached nominal settlement of a New Jersey case against a catheter manufacturer.

Obtained a defense verdict in a New Jersey case against elevator maintenance company.

Obtained defense verdicts in mass tort cases in Philadelphia County on many occasions for lack of sufficient product identification or exposure by plaintiff to clients’ products. 

Successfully defended and obtained the dismissal of a latex manufacturer due to lack of involvement with latex in its gloves.

Tried a case in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court against a medical device spray company that settled shortly after cross-examination of the plaintiff.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in case involving a death and alleged brain injury allegedly sustained in an accident following the design and installation of an elevator.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million. Obtained dismissal of construction company and obtained nominal settlement for owner.

Successfully defended construction company in case involving a death following an alleged fall from a multi-story building during construction.  Case involved very complex indemnity and insurance issues with settlement demand of $20 million.

Successfully defended construction company and owner in suit involving electrical burns during installation of power to a construction site, resulting in dismissal of owner and nominal settlement for construction company.  Settlement demand was in excess of $10 million.

Obtained summary judgment on many occasions in favor of construction companies involving statutory employer defense.

Successfully defended against injunction sought to force insurer to pay insurance policy proceeds into court.

Obtained revision of insurance policy with dismissal of client insurer from suit.

Successfully defended insurance brokers on many occasions involving allegations of potential gap in coverage with dismissal of brokers from suits.

Obtained dismissal of insurance broker from suit pending in Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court seeking over a million dollars in damages if prize policy placed by broker did not cover casino winnings. 

Privacy Settings
Your Privacy Choices
We value your privacy. Under privacy laws in your jurisdiction, you have the right to control how your personal information is used, including the right to opt out of the “sale” or “sharing” of your personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. You may also limit the use of your sensitive personal information.

Below, you can review and adjust your cookie and data sharing preferences. For more information about how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy.

Your Rights and Choices

Opt Out of Sale or Sharing: You may opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information for advertising and analytics purposes by turning off Advertising & Targeting Cookies. We will honor your choice and will not sell or share your personal information for these purposes unless you enable these cookies again. Wilson Elser does not sell or share personal information in any other manner.

Limit Use of Sensitive Personal Information: If we collect sensitive personal information, you may limit its use to only what is necessary to provide requested services by adjusting your preferences here. Please contact privacy@wilsonelser.com with any questions.

Global Privacy Control: We honor browser-based opt-out signals, such as the Global Privacy Control (GPC). If we detect such a signal, your opt-out preference will be automatically applied.

These cookies are essential for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms.

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not function properly.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They may be set through our site by us or our analytics partners to understand your interests and deliver more relevant content to you. If you do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site