Newsletters
Professionally Speaking
Q2 2025
Wilson Elser is well attuned to the rapid changes that impact the accounting profession.
Our Accounting Practice professionals have litigated virtually every type of auditing matter – from one-off lawsuits to multijurisdictional class actions – compiling an impressive record of success. We also have the requisite experience, vast industry knowledge, national footprint and integrated team approach to provide related services, including:
Integrating these services on a national basis when needed invariably proves to be more effective and cost-efficient for our clients. It also translates into an uncommon ability to serve as sole legal adviser for several of our clients, including some of the larger accounting firms and networks.
As dictated by a client’s specific needs, we work “cross-practice” with other functional areas within our firm. We have the background and resources to assist with the growing number of challenges that arise in arenas such as cyber risk, privacy rights, employment law, management liability, unfair competition, class actions, and commercial and transactional services.
Wilson Elser is proud of its reputation as the preeminent defense litigation firm in the United States. For 45 years, our litigators have prevailed on behalf of accounting firms and related entities. We work closely with carriers to retain many of the nation’s foremost expert witnesses, mediators, arbitrators and electronic discovery consultants. The insurers with whom we work appreciate our philosophy of fighting hard while avoiding wasted effort. We intelligently and aggressively defend parties in malpractice lawsuits and against claims by third-party users of accounting firm services involving a broad range of claims. These include audit failures, security laws claims, failure to detect embezzlement and fraud, providing advice regarding allegedly faulty tax or estate planning and improperly valuing businesses.
Our reach extends to state and federal jurisdictions nationwide. As noted, we also represent accountants in arbitrations and mediations and before the ethics committees of professional organizations.
In addition to malpractice lawsuits, our attorneys handle many types of commercial litigation that involve the accounting profession, including restrictive covenant litigation and partnership disputes. For example, we represent clients in business disputes with competitors, contract disputes with vendors and landlords, enforcement of restrictive covenants and dissolution proceedings.
Apart from malpractice and commercial litigation, our attorneys help clients respond to subpoenas in connection with grand jury investigations, criminal trials and litigation – areas often fraught with peril for the accounting profession.
Our depth of experience relative to accounting firms and the suits brought against them enables us to skillfully advise on managing risk. We specifically address matters involving federal securities regulations, ERISA, compliance with professional standards and regulatory mandates, and best practices.
Our attorneys are adept at crafting engagement letters that avoid potential trouble spots and unambiguously define scope of duties. We also prepare clear, effective disengagement letters that decrease the potential for malpractice suits. We advise on communications between predecessor and successor auditors, document retention requirements and letters withdrawing reports.
We work closely with clients to create a culture that prevents lawsuits through analysis and strengthening of an organization’s operations – from document retention to timekeeping to client selection and disengagement – and provide training seminars that address such key topics as risk management, ethics and practice management. Our attorneys frequently are requested to present on these and related topics to insurers and accounting firms alike.
New and often complex regulations translate into more-aggressive scrutiny of our clients and resulting increases in exposure. Indeed, failure to keep pace with the continual changes in regulatory compliance can lead to drastic, even fatal consequences. Practice attorneys interact with regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, the PCAOB and the FASB. Our familiarity with emerging rules, issues and procedures allows us to better protect our clients’ interests should they become the subject of inquiries.
We represent accountants in ethics proceedings before the AICPA, the IRS, the SEC, the PCAOB and professional societies and state licensing boards. We have handled these matters from initial inquiry letters to dispositive hearings on the merits.
An increasingly “flat” and interconnected world has given rise to international accounting associations and networks. Having access to the extensive resources of these organizations is often required to properly service an account.
Wilson Elser is intimately familiar with these international accounting associations and networks, having collaborated with them for more than three decades. We have served them in various capacities, including:
Wilson Elser frequently is involved in the business transactions of accounting firms, which have escalated rapidly as a function of increased competition throughout the industry. Typically involving mergers, joint ventures with nonprofessional firms and practice divestitures, they require experienced drafting of shareholder, partnership, employment and other agreements.
Drawing from deep experience and national resources, Wilson Elser represents accounting firms in mergers and dissolutions, always in the broader context of their business strategies. We negotiate the terms of these transactions and cement them with proper documentation.
We also assist in the creation of limited liability partnerships and professional corporations. For accounting firms seeking to expand their operations, we assist in registering practices in additional states. We also address litigation matters in relation to partners and restrictive convents. Since these transactions frequently involve multiple jurisdictions, our national scope is a valuable resource in efficiently and appropriately advising our accounting clients.
Wilson Elser is well attuned to the rapid changes that impact the accounting profession.
Our Accounting Practice professionals have litigated virtually every type of auditing matter – from one-off lawsuits to multijurisdictional class actions – compiling an impressive record of success. We also have the requisite experience, vast industry knowledge, national footprint and integrated team approach to provide related services, including:
Integrating these services on a national basis when needed invariably proves to be more effective and cost-efficient for our clients. It also translates into an uncommon ability to serve as sole legal adviser for several of our clients, including some of the larger accounting firms and networks.
As dictated by a client’s specific needs, we work “cross-practice” with other functional areas within our firm. We have the background and resources to assist with the growing number of challenges that arise in arenas such as cyber risk, privacy rights, employment law, management liability, unfair competition, class actions, and commercial and transactional services.
John Benford (Partner-Orlando, FL) and Peter Larkin (Partner-White Plains, NY) obtained summary judgment in an accounting malpractice case pending in state court in Orlando, Florida, where the plaintiff was seeking $3.2 million in damages (including prejudgment interest). The case involved two accounting firms (including a national firm) and one of their CPAs in an accounting malpractice lawsuit brought by a Florida-based petroleum company. The plaintiff alleged that the CPA had colluded with its former CEO to increase the CEO’s bonus by using a formula that deviated from the formula contained in the CEO’s employment agreement, and which the plaintiff’s board of directors never approved. The plaintiff claimed that the CPA’s use of the alternate formula caused the CEO to be overpaid a total of approximately $1.2 million in unauthorized bonus compensation. The company also claimed approximately $2 million in prejudgment interest relating to the alleged overpayments. Through targeted deposition testimony, John and Peter demonstrated that several members of the plaintiff’s management were aware of the CPA’s use of the alternate bonus formula and, therefore, the plaintiff petroleum company had institutional knowledge that the CPA was using the different formula.
John Y. Benford and Peter J. Larkin
White Plains, New York, partners Peter Larkin and Rebecca Gelozin represented an accounting firm client regarding an informal inquiry from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Division of Enforcement and Investigations. After providing extensive documents and information, our client was notified by the PCAOB that it has completed its informal inquiry and does not intend to recommend any enforcement action. PCAOB enforcement actions have increased in frequency and intensity in recent years, leading to many jaw-dropping fines being levied by the PCAOB, particularly when there are questions of compliance with the quality control standards. We avoided not only any mention of a fine by the PCAOB enforcement attorneys but also escalation from an informal to a formal investigation, not only keeping the firm out of harm’s way but also truncating what is often a very difficult process to navigate.
Peter J. Larkin and Rebecca R. Gelozin